diff options
| author | erdgeist <erdgeist@erdgeist.org> | 2013-09-24 17:36:33 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | erdgeist <erdgeist@erdgeist.org> | 2020-05-23 13:39:31 +0000 |
| commit | d7b502b1edecd8f3f0f603787a02292de07a62c0 (patch) | |
| tree | 79645e94d26ce6f4cf204cb5fc20ee0c3b6e8d15 | |
| parent | ae840a380ae5567668138f6e7d033b8752460af8 (diff) | |
committing page revision 13
| -rw-r--r-- | updates/2013/ccc-breaks-apple-touchid.en.md | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/updates/2013/ccc-breaks-apple-touchid.en.md b/updates/2013/ccc-breaks-apple-touchid.en.md index dac0a4b8..673b38e1 100644 --- a/updates/2013/ccc-breaks-apple-touchid.en.md +++ b/updates/2013/ccc-breaks-apple-touchid.en.md | |||
| @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ | |||
| 1 | title: Chaos Computer Club breaks Apple TouchID | 1 | title: Chaos Computer Club breaks Apple TouchID |
| 2 | date: 2013-09-21 22:04:00 | 2 | date: 2013-09-21 22:04:00 |
| 3 | updated: 2013-09-24 17:36:07 | 3 | updated: 2013-09-24 17:36:33 |
| 4 | author: frank | 4 | author: frank |
| 5 | tags: update, pressemitteilung, biometrie, biometrics, apple, touchid, fingerprint | 5 | tags: update, pressemitteilung, biometrie, biometrics, apple, touchid, fingerprint |
| 6 | 6 | ||
| @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ The process described above proved to be somewhat unreliable as the | |||
| 49 | depth of the ridges created by the toner was a little too shallow. | 49 | depth of the ridges created by the toner was a little too shallow. |
| 50 | Therefore an alternative process based on the same principle was | 50 | Therefore an alternative process based on the same principle was |
| 51 | utilized and has been demonstrated in an extended video available | 51 | utilized and has been demonstrated in an extended video available |
| 52 | [here](http://www.heise.de/video/artikel/The-iPhone-5s-Touch-ID-hack-in-detail-1966044.html "Refined TouchID hacking process"). First, | 52 | [here](http://heise.de/-1966044 "Refined TouchID hacking process"). First, |
| 53 | the residual fingerprint from the phone is either photographed or | 53 | the residual fingerprint from the phone is either photographed or |
| 54 | scanned with a flatbed scanner at 2400 dpi. Then the image is converted | 54 | scanned with a flatbed scanner at 2400 dpi. Then the image is converted |
| 55 | to black & white, inverted and mirrored. This image is then printed onto | 55 | to black & white, inverted and mirrored. This image is then printed onto |