diff options
author | 46halbe <46halbe@berlin.ccc.de> | 2013-08-12 22:24:52 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | 46halbe <46halbe@berlin.ccc.de> | 2020-05-23 13:39:29 +0000 |
commit | 37a83340693619792095760221f480db8fabf826 (patch) | |
tree | 53efed1cdea668269ad62ae9dcc847b95926664d /updates/2013 | |
parent | b1416e32de23b5470799d4a8b07c7ae1db68ae04 (diff) |
committing page revision 6
Diffstat (limited to 'updates/2013')
-rw-r--r-- | updates/2013/sommermaerchen.en.md | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/updates/2013/sommermaerchen.en.md b/updates/2013/sommermaerchen.en.md index 54a83660..66213402 100644 --- a/updates/2013/sommermaerchen.en.md +++ b/updates/2013/sommermaerchen.en.md | |||
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ | |||
1 | title: “E-Mail Made in Germany”: A Summer’s Tale of Secure E-Mail | 1 | title: “E-Mail Made in Germany”: A Summer’s Tale of Secure E-Mail |
2 | date: 2013-08-09 14:12:00 | 2 | date: 2013-08-09 14:12:00 |
3 | updated: 2013-08-12 17:45:56 | 3 | updated: 2013-08-12 22:24:52 |
4 | author: 46halbe | 4 | author: 46halbe |
5 | tags: update, pressemitteilung, demail, ssl, gnupg | 5 | tags: update, pressemitteilung, demail, ssl, gnupg, encryption |
6 | 6 | ||
7 | While the public debate about PRISM, Tempora and XKeyScore is continuing, webmail service providers seem to be finally waking up: Two of the largest e-mail providers in Germany have announced plans to enable encryption on all connections from 2014. | 7 | While the public debate about PRISM, Tempora and XKeyScore is continuing, webmail service providers seem to be finally waking up: Two of the largest e-mail providers in Germany have announced plans to enable encryption on all connections from 2014. |
8 | 8 | ||
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ servers – will also be able to use these encrypted connections. | |||
16 | The Chaos Computer Club (CCC) appreciates these companies’ intention to | 16 | The Chaos Computer Club (CCC) appreciates these companies’ intention to |
17 | encrypt their customers’ mail traffic in the future. However, what they | 17 | encrypt their customers’ mail traffic in the future. However, what they |
18 | haven't said is why the underlying technology, available since the late | 18 | haven't said is why the underlying technology, available since the late |
19 | 1990s, has not been enabled previously by default. A standard feature of | 19 | 1990s, has not been previously enabled by default. A standard feature of |
20 | competitors’ services – enforced encryption for accessing an e-mail | 20 | competitors’ services – enforced encryption for accessing an e-mail |
21 | account – is now being sold as a technological advance and an | 21 | account – is now being sold as a technological advance and an |
22 | innovation. | 22 | innovation. |